The complaint filed against the petitioner was due for re-filing as per registry objections. As the petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date, the case was disposed of by direction to re-file.
Disposed of accordingly due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
141 I N COMP-3177-2024 D ate of decision: 22.11.2024
Anil Sachdev a ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Hary a na and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HO N ’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN C HAUDHARY
Present : N one.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
22.11.2024 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) ashok JUDGE
W hether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No W hether reportable : Yes / No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.11.22 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Sachdev
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
