Disposed
Pooja Goel v. Raghubir Singh & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/4038/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
503 Present: Singh, Advocate had put in…
What the court decided
AI extract
503 Present: Singh, Advocate had put in…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DAILY LOK ADALAT
BENCH NO.3
503 FAO-4038-2005 (O&M) POOJA GOEL VS RAGHBIR SINGH & ORS.
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gurpreet Singh Ahluwa l ia, Advocate for UIIC, Haryana.
On the last date of heari n g i.e. 27.08.2024, Ms. Preet i Singh, A d vocate had put in appearan c e and sought time to file he r vakalatn a ma . Today, she has not come p resent.
Notice issued to the sol e appellant has been serve d through f a ther but none has put in app e arance to pursue the matter. In the absence of the a ppellant or any authorize d represent a tive, we are left with no optio n but to consign this appeal t o record. L i berty is, however, granted t o the sole appellant to get i t revived, i f need be, by moving an appro p riate application.
A copy of this order be sen t to the learned counsel for th e parties. A copy of this order be also se n t at the last known address o f the sole a p pellant.
(N.K. KAPOOR) PRESIDENT
(K.C. GUPTA) MEMBER
10.09.2024 NainaRajput
NAINA KATHIAT 2024.09.13 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
POOJA GOEL
RAGHBIR SINGH & ORS.
N.K. KAPOOR
K.C. GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court