ThisHighCourtdismissedtheappealforwantofprosecutionastheappellantscouldnotproduceafileandexhibitednointerestinpursuingthematter.
Present appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
213
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-4031-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.11.2024
Ratna Raj Laxmi and others
......Appellants
Vs.
Haider Ali and others ......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
This case pertains to the category of fully burnt cases of the year 2006. As per office report, name of Mr. S.S.Ahlawat, Advocate, has not been found in the Bar Directory and Mr. S.K.Galhotra, has left the practice. Further, no effort has been made by the parties to get the file reconstructed. It seems that the appellants are no more interested in pursuing the matter. This Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
29.11.2024 Virrendra
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.11.30 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ratna Raj Laxmi and others
Haider Ali and others
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
