In an appeal from which the appellant did not appear on five consecutive dates and failed to do so on the date of hearing, the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
������������������������������������� �������������
����
�������������
������ ���!"#"�$%� ����������������
&"'�$(�'��)�*)�$
++++++�,,�--�$�.#/
&#+
�$��,�0*1�'��$(���)�'# ++++++��#,�$(�$�.#/
����2%����3�4��2�5+���5�����5��������5���2�
�������� �����������������������
��������������������������������� ���� ����������������������� ��������������������!������
����"�#���$�%#����������������� ���� �&�'#$���(����$�������������� ��������������������
5��������5���2���+�.���4/�
On the last five consecutive dates of hearing, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the matter. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution.
�������.5��������5���2�/
����������������������������������
����������������
���*�������
Sonia Arora 2024.10.04 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
+��������������,��������� "������ ������������������� ���������
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal when one side failed to appear repeatedly without justification.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
