Fully burnt appeal listed for disposition. Due to absence of the appellant and lack of representation from either side, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. Liberty was reserved to revive the appeal if a cause of action survives.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Liberty reserved to revive; fees directed to advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1285-2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.11.2024
Avtar Singh
......Appellant
Vs.
Hunardeep Singh and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for the respondent-Insurance Company. ****
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
This case pertains to the category of fully burnt cases of the year 2007. Despite being informed by the Registry, today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Further, no effort has been made by the parties to get the file reconstructed. It seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the matter. This Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
25.11.2024 Virrendra
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.11.26 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Avtar Singh
Hunardeep Singh
Insurance Company
SudeepTi Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
