Disposed

Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Apr 2024CWP/9634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a decision on a representation regarding sewerage and rainwater accumulation in Kokri Heran village. Court granted liberty to file the representation and directed the Deputy Commissioner to decide it within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file representation; Deputy Commissioner directed to decide within eight weeks.

Ranjit Singh Vs State of Punja… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

��

¶2

119

¶3

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.9634 of 2024 Date of Decision: 29.04.2024

Ranjit Singh

..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

¶11

¶12

Present: Mr. Taqdeerjeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. *******

¶13

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 22.02.2024 (Annexure P- 1) rectifying the interlock lining work in the village Kokri Heran, District Moga, Punjab that has elevated the level of streets and consequently created sewerage dump and accumulation of rain water in the petitioner’s house as well as in the adjoining houses which is causing mental/physical harassment and stress to the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be granted liberty to file appropriate representation before respondent No.5 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Moga, Punjab and he be directed to decide the same expeditiously.

¶16

Notice of motion.

¶17

RITTU 2024.04.30 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CWP No.9634 of 2024

¶19

2024:PHHC:057604

¶20

-2-

¶21

On asking of the Court, Mr. Navneet Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondentsState. He has submitted that if the petitioner files any such representation before respondent No.5 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Moga, Punjab, then respondent No.5 would decide the same expeditiously.

¶22

After hearing both the parties and perusing the record, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file his appropriate representation before respondent No.5 as prayed for within a week from today. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner within the stipulated period, then respondent No.5 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Moga, Punjab is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of its filing.

¶23

		(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE
29.04.2024
rittu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
	Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶24

RITTU 2024.04.30 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohinder Singh @ Mahinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Navdeep Garg Vs Municipal Corporation Bathinda and Others

Dushyant Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dilawar Singh Vs State of Punjab through Director General of Police,Punjab

Samunder Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Darshan Singh Vs Chief Canal Officer Bhakhra Water Services Circle Panchkula and Ors.