Disposed

Jasleen Kaur Brar and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jul 2024CWP/8674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court observed that maternal uncle residing with children opposed their transfer to a new school. Orders were passed directing the Bloomingdale School, Kotkapura, not to insist upon the School Leaving Certificate for the petitioners' admission.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Bloomingdale School, Kotkapura, not to insist upon School Leaving Certificate for the petitioners.

Jasleen Kaur Brar and Another Vs State of… — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

[265] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH

¶2

CWP-8674-2024 Date of D ecision : 09.07.2024

¶3

Jasleen K aur Brar and another …Petitioners

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of P unjab and others ….Respondents

¶6

Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

¶7

Present: Mr. Anoop Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶8

Mr. Puru Jarewal, Asstt. AG , Punjab.

¶9

Mr. Beant Singh Seemar, A d vocate for respondent No.3/CBSE.

¶10

Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6.

¶11

Mr. Amaninder Singh Sekho n , Advocate for respondent Nos.7 & 8.

¶12

¶13

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶14

[1] Parties are present in person.

¶15

[2] Children have also come pre s ent.

¶16

[3] I have interacted with the m . With the intervention of the Court, re s pondent No.8 submits that since children are residing with the i r maternal parents, he would not objecte d their admission to school ov e r there. H o wever, submits that it is not i n the interest of the children th a t they are u prooted from the school wherei n , they were already going and t o admit th e m in a fresh school. He furt h er submits that children are i n RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.07.11 04:58 I attest to the accuracy and illegal cu s tody of their maternal uncle/au n t. integrity of this document

¶17

CWP-86 7 4-2024 -2-

¶18

[4] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitione r s are already stand admit t ed in Bloomingdale Schoo l , Kotkapur a .

¶19

[5] The Bloomingdale School, K otkapura, is directed not to insi s t upon Sch o ol Leaving Certificate.

¶20

[6] Maternal uncle is present in C ourt and has been identified b y the coun s el representing the petitioners and assures the Court that th e children w ould not be separated from ea c h other and their custody shal l follow th e orders passed by any Court of c ompetent jurisdiction.

¶21

[7] Disposed off accordingly.

¶22

(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE

¶23

09.07.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma'

¶24

Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.07.11 04:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jasleen Kaur Brar and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jasleen Kaur Brar and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogesh Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Umed Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs Department of Home Affairs Haryana and Others

Ehc Sanjay Vs State of Haryana and Others

Malkit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Narender Kumar Ranga Vs State of Haryana