Petitioner sought mandamus to take action against a mineral concessionaire for illegal mining causing environmental harm. The court noted penalties were already recovered, permitting the petitioner to withdraw the petition, which was subsequently disposed of.
Withdrawal of the petition permitted and the CWP disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-6724-2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
126
CWP-6724-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2024
Rajesh Kumar
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Mr. Gagan Pradeep Singh Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL)
SATYAWAN 2024.05.25 04:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
CWP-6724-2024 (O&M)
in paragraph 6 thereof, it has been stated that an FIR bearing No. 29 dated 09.04.2024 under Section 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1956 and 379 IPC has been registered against the Mineral Concessionaire concerned, who has indulged in illegal mining activities in the zone concerned.
(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE
22.05.2024 Satyawan
SATYAWAN 2024.05.25 04:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajesh Kumar
State of Punjab
SURESHWAR THAKUR
SUKHVINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
