Writ petition challenging a Labour Court award that ordered reinstatement but denied back wages on the ground that the petitioner was practising as an advocate after termination. The Court, without commenting on merits, directed the respondent to pay Rs.50,000 lump sum and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-5719-1999 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
207 CWP-5719-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.07.2024
DARSHAN LAL …. PETITIONER
V/S
THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, PATIALA AND ORS
…. RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present :- Mr.Puneet K. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.07.24 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-5719-1999 (O&M) 2
the initial years, there was no question of gainful employment. The respondent did not lead evidence with respect to his gainful employment during 1980-1996.
6. Disposed of.
disposed of.
24.07.2024 anju
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.07.24 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, whose reinstatement was ordered but back wages denied for gainful employment in practice, was entitled to compensation.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
DARSHAN LAL
THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, PATIALA
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
