Writ petition withdrawn after counsel conceded no part of the cause of action arose within the Court's jurisdiction; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach a competent court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:047096
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
123
CWP-486-2024 Date of Decision : 08.04.2024
DEEPAK KUMAR
… PETITIONER
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. S.S.Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shreyanshi Verma, Central Govt. Counsel for the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
arisen within jurisdiction of this Court, Mr. S.S.Kaushik, Advocate seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach Court of competent jurisdiction.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
08.04.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.04.08 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court had territorial jurisdiction over the cause of action.
DEEPAK KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
