the post of Clerk and one post was vacant and another became vacant in the year 2015 on account of promotion of Sh. Raju, who was promoted to the post of Auction Recorder from Clerk. The petitioner submitted application for consideration for promotion to the post of Clerk. Although the petitioner was eligible as she was matriculate and clause of passing the typewriting test was relaxed in her case and as on that date, she was having experience of 03 years and 09 months as against required experience of 05 years as Peon, however, her case was considered by the Committee and it was ordered that she would be promoted on notional basis and would be entitled to the pay-scale on the post of Clerk on completion of 05 years service as Peon. She has been granted the said pay-scale after she has completed 05 years experience. In terms of Circulars dated 07.10.1997 (Annexure P-3) and 11.12.2012 (Annexure P-4), the Board was competent to make promotion to the post of Clerk, although the said powers have been withdrawn later on by the Board vide letter dated 26.07.2017 (Annexure P-6), however, the said order cannot be made applicable retrospectively and would be applicable only with effect from the date of issue of the said order i.e. 26.07.2017. In the impugned order dated 01.10.2019 (Annexure P-9), it has been admitted by the Board that the petitioner now fulfills all the requisite conditions for the promotion not even as Clerk but also for the post of Auction Recorder but since she was not having the experience of 05 years, when she was promoted to the post of Clerk, therefore, she is liable to be reverted back. Once the petitioner has already completed the experience of 05 years on 08.07.2016, she cannot be reverted back in
