Writ petition by Balak Nath @ Madhu Baba against the State of Haryana, decided in terms of a detailed judgment of even date passed in CWP No.13864-2012 (Sushil Kumar and others v. State of Haryana).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:040490-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3958-2023 Reserved On: 05.03.2024 Date of Decision: 19.03.2024
Balak Nath @ Madhu Baba.
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA
Argued by : Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Pardeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana, Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Mr. Shivam Garg, Advocate.
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
For orders, see detailed judgement of even date, passed in
CWP No.13864-2012, titled Sushil Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana
and others.
(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE
(LALIT BATRA) JUDGE
March 19, 2024 raman Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Raman Kumar 2024.03.21 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Balak Nath @ Madhu Baba
State of Haryana
Sureshwar Thakur
Lalit Batra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
