A PIL challenging pending consideration of a retired employee's representation for re-employment. The State accepted a notice of motion to decide the representation within eight weeks.
Petitioner satisfied; State agrees to decide pending representation within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No.2024:PHHC:002453
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
CWP No. 351-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 10.01.2024
Jaswinder Jeet Singh . . .Petitioner Versus
State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: Mr. Mangesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
RIYA 2024.01.11 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 351-2024 (O&M) -22024:PHHC: 002453
order.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
10.01.2024 Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes /No Whether Reportable: Yes /No
RIYA 2024.01.11 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a retired employee, should be directed to get his pending representation on re-employment decided within a specific time frame.
Jaswinder Jeet Singh
State of Haryana
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
