Petition challenged the Judo Federation of India's Electoral College listing private respondents as the petitioner-Association's representatives. Counsel stated elections could not be held and an Administrator was appointed, so the grievance did not survive; the petition was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
279
CWP-3507-2022 Date of Decision: 04.11.2024
PUNJAB JUDO ASSOCIATION (REGD.)
... Petitioner
VERSUS
JUDO FEDERATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
... Respondents
**CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. ******
Present: Mr. Gurnoor S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for respondents No.1 and 3.
Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.2.
Ms. Ishani Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Surjit Singh Swaich, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. ****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in the present petition is to the Electoral College issued vide letter dated 10.02.2022 by the respondent-Judo Federation of India to the extent whereby they have wrongfully shown private respondents No.4 and 5 to be the authorized representatives of the petitioner-Association.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the elections pursuant to the abovementioned letter dated 10.02.2022 could not be held and that an Administrator has already been appointed. He further contends that the grievance espoused by the petitioner would thus not survive any longer till the process of holding the elections afresh is initiated. He thus does not press the instant petition with liberty to approach this Court as and when the process of holding the elections afresh is initiated or the cause of action still survives.
RAJENDER KUMAR 2024.11.05 06:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-3507-2022
-2-
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same. Disposed of as not pressed at this stage with the liberty as
aforesaid.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) NOVEMBER 04, 2024. JUDGE rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2024.11.05 06:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Electoral College letter dated 10.02.2022 wrongly showed respondents No.4 and 5 as the petitioner's authorized representatives.
Punjab Judo Association (Regd.)
Judo Federation of India
Respondent No.2 (State of Punjab)
Respondent No.4
Respondent No.5
Vinod S. Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
