Writ petition challenged rejection of interest by excise authorities. The State informed the court it would withdraw the order dated 13.06.2024; the petition was not pressed and was disposed of, with liberty to pass a fresh order on payment of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-31100-2024 (O&M)
Page 1 of 2
108
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-31100-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.12.2024
ABW SUNC I TY
. . . . Petitione r Vs.
STATE OF H ARYANA AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondent s ****
**CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH ******
Present: M r. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate w ith M r. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. M s. Mamta Singla Talwar, DA G , Haryana.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.19 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-31100-2024 (O&M)
Page 2 of 2
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
December 18, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? r speaking/reasoned?
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? r speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.19 12:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the State's decision to withdraw the order rejecting interest.
ABW Suncity
State of Haryana and others
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
