Writ petition filed by a private company against the Union of India and others; counsel submitted it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
226
CWP-2981-2021 Decided on : 29.07.2024
JFE Shoji Trade India Private Limited
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepesh kakkar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3 & 5.
Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.4.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
July 29, 2024 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2024.07.29 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
JFE Shoji Trade India Private Limited
Union of India
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
