Disposed

United Riceland Ltd. v. State of Pb.Etc.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Aug 2024CWP/2946/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order disposes of a writ petition filed by United Riceland Ltd. regarding a market fee demand. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit the specified amount within two months, upon which the respondents agreed to accept the fee without further additions.

What did the court decide?

Directs petitioner to deposit the demanded market fee within two months; respondents to accept the deposit without further additions.

United Riceland Ltd. Vs State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CWP-2946-2005 - 1 -

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

209-1

¶4

CWP-2946-2005 Decided on : 06.08.2024

¶5

United Riceland Limited

¶6

. . . Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

. . . Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

¶11

PRESENT: Dr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Nav Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶12

Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana.

¶13

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate and Mr. Daksh Khatri, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3.

¶14

¶15

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)

¶16

Petitioner – United Riceland Ltd. (now known as ‘TRL Riceland Pvt. Ltd.’), the Company Secretary-cum-Senior Manager (Merger) had submitted before this Court about his willingness to deposit the market fee, as was being demanded vide impugned notice/order dated 20^th December, 2004 and order dated 31^st January, 2005. The respondents have agreed to accept the said amount without any further additions.

¶17

Keeping in view the above, we dispose of this writ petition with observation that the petitioner may deposit the said market fee, as demanded vide impugned notice/order dated 20^th December, 2004 and order dated 31^st January, 2005. If the same is deposited within a period of two months henceforth, the respondents – Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board,

¶18

JAWALA RAM 2024.08.08 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶19

CWP-2946-2005 - 2 -

¶20

Karnal and the Market Committee, Nilokheri (Karnal), shall accept the same without any further additions, as consented before this Court.

¶21

Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶22

Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶23

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

¶24

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE

¶25

August 06, 2024 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶26

JAWALA RAM 2024.08.08 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

United Riceland Ltd. v. State of Pb.Etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

United Riceland Ltd. v. State of Pb.Etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Faridabad Vs Mohini Goel

M/S Aggarwal Rice and General Mills Vs State of Punjab and Others

M/S Yadav Rice Mills Vs State of Punjab and Others

Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S V.K. Sood Engg. & Contractors P Ltd.

United Rice Land Ltd. Vs State of Hry. and Others