This High Court dismissed a writ petition for quashing a PLAPUS award and order that directed reimbursement of 10 lacs plus interest, holding the matter fully covered by a previous decision in CWP No.7031 of 2014.
The writ petition challenging the award and order was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CWP No.23143 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.23143 of 2015 Date of decision: 30.10.2015
Oriental Bank of Commerce
....Petitioner
Versus
The Permanent Lok Adalat for Public Utility Services, Narnaul and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J.
Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the award dated 26.08.2015 (Annexure P-10) and order dated 09.09.2015 (Annexure P-12) passed by respondent No.1 – Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Narnaul (hereinafter referred to as 'PLAPUS'), whereby petitioner has been directed to reimburse amount to respondents No.2 to 4 to the extent of ` 10.00 lacs plus interest which has accrued on that amount.
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.11.20 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
-2-
CWP No.23143 of 2015
I need not reproduce the facts of the case as the issue involved in this case has been dealt with by this Court in CWP No.7031 of 2014 titled 'The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and another v. Gurdarshan Singh and another' decided on 19.09.2015.
The decision rendered in the case of The Branch Manager,
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra) is fully applicable to the present writ petition and as such liable to be dismissed.
Resultantly, this writ petition is dismissed.
October 30, 2015 R.S.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
RAVINDER SINGH 2015.11.20 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the PLAPUS award and order is liable to be allowed or dismissed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and another v. Gurdarshan Singh and anotherDistinguished¶20
CWP No.7031 of 2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Oriental Bank of Commerce
The Permanent Lok Adalat for Public Utility Services, Narnaul
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
