Allowed

Dhanwant Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Sept 2024CWP/22118/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph oral order addressed a writ petition challenging the vacation of a status quo order. The High Court allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and directing that the stay under Section 7(2) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 continue until the next date of hearing in the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Set-aside of order dated 14.08.2024; stay order to continue till the date of next hearing in the appeal (23.10.2024).

Dhanwant Singh Vs State of Punjab… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

118

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP No.22118 of 2024 Date of Decision: 05.09.2024

Dhanwant Singh

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶8

…Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶10

Present:Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab.

¶12

¶13

G.S. Sandhawalia, J.(Oral)

¶14

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order passed by respondent No.2-Joint Development Commissioner, exercising the powers of Commissioner, Punjab, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) on 14.08.2024 (Annexure P-6), whereby while adjourning the appeal under Section 7(2) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961, to 23.10.2024 by granting last opportunity to file written arguments before the next date of hearing, the statusquo order was vacated.

¶15

The sole argument put-forth is that there is an eviction order dated 03.03.2023, which is subject matter of challenge, passed by the Collector (Panchayat Land), DDPO, Patiala, wherein the directions have been issued for eviction from the land in dispute and the Gram Panchayat has been directed to take possession of the land and if the interim protection is not continued till the pendency of the appeal, it would render the appeal infructuous.

¶16

NEETU RANI 2024.09.09 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

¶17

CWP No.22118 of 2024 -2-

¶18

On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that the statusquo was granted on the condition that the fresh demarcation was to be done and the report was to be given in the Court, which has been conducted and the same is adverse to the interest of the petitioner. In such circumstances, the Appellate Authority has rightly chosen to vacate the stay.

¶19

Be that as it may, since the appeal is still pending and is listed for 23.10.2024, it would not be appropriate and would lead to mis-carriage of justice, if the present petitioner is dispossessed till the pendency of the appeal as we cannot pre-suppose the order which is to be passed in the appeal and in case, the appeal is allowed, further complications would arise.

¶20

In such circumstances, we set-aside the order passed by respondent No.2-Joint Development Commissioner, exercising the powers of Commissioner, Punjab S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) dated 14.08.2024 (Annexure P-6) and direct that the stay will continue till the next date of hearing in the appeal, i.e 23.10.2024. Respondent No.2 is also requested to decide the appeal on the said date in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. We do not issue the notice to respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat as it would only delay the proceedings and also to avoid the expenses that may be incurred by the said respondent.

¶21

Resultantly, the present writ petition is allowed accordingly.

¶22

(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE

¶23

05.09.2024		(MEE	NAKSHI I. MEHTA)
neetu			JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes
	Whether Reportable:	No

¶24

NEETU RANI 2024.09.09 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

Dhanwant Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanwant Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaswant Singh Vs Gram Panchayat Malikpur

Sanjeev Kumar and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

State of Punjab and Others Vs M/S Ashirwad Industries

Sanjay Sharma Vs State of Haryana and Other

Joginder Singh Vs Director Land Records and Ors.

The Chairman Faridkot Improvement Trust and Anr. Vs Amarjeet Singh and Anr.