Petitioner sought withdrawal of the withdrawn Writ Petition upon the condition that the Court would not interfere with the impugned order. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22013-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.11.2024
M/S VICT O RA AUTO PRIVATE LIMITE D
. . . . Petitio n er
Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondents
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present Mr. Nand Kishore Sharma, Ad v ocate for the petitioner.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
November 05, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Wh e ther speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Wh e ther reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.11.05 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S VICT O RA AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
SANJAY VASHISTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
