The petitioner sought direction for implementation of a partition order and mutation. The court directed respondent authorities to proceed in accordance with law without commenting on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.21494 of 2024 Date of Decision: 20.09.2024
Gagan
….Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.20 04:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.21494 of 2024 -2-
approached this Court by way of CWP- 9413 of 2024 wherein notice of motion has been issued.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
20.09.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.20 04:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to implement the partition order and mutation?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gagan
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
