Dismissed

Maninder Pal Singh Brar v. Pb State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Fed

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Aug 2024CWP/21148/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction to the respondent to consider his promotional case and modify a specific order. The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously within three months, ensuring a speaking order is passed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2023 expeditiously by passing a speaking order within three months.

Maninder Pal Singh Brar Vs Pb State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CWP No.21148 of 2024 (O&M)

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

120

¶5

CWP No.21148 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.08.2024

¶6

Maninder Pal Singh Brar

¶7

....Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Punjab State Cooperative Supply & Marketing Federation Limited ....Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

¶11

Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Lovedev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)

¶13

Prayer in this writ petition filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the promotional case of the petitioner against the vacant post of Deputy Chief Manager and to direct the respondent to modify the order dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure P-8) whereby the illegal and arbitrary condition has been imposed upon the petitioner for not to consider the experience of higher post in violation of the Markfed Employees (Common Cadre) Rules, 1990 (Annexure P-1) and in alternative, to decide the representation dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P-13) filed by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the year 2019, one Sanjeev Manaktala, who is immediate senior of the petitioner was promoted as Deputy Chief Manager despite there being two vacancies existed in General Category and the petitioner being eligible

¶14

MOHD YAKUB 2024.08.29 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

¶15

CWP No.21148 of 2024 (O&M)

¶16

¶17

to the post of Deputy Chief Manager, was denied the promotion. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case time bound directions are issued to the respondent to decide the representation dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P-13) filed by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order.

¶18

Notice of motion.

¶19

Ms. Pushpanjali Bisht, Advocate for Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶20

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case.

¶21

Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide representation dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P-13), submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Liberty is granted to petitioner to supplement the representation dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P-13), if so required.

¶23

		(NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE
29.08.2024
yakub	Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes/No
	Whether reportable:	Yes/No

¶24

MOHD YAKUB 2024.08.29 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

Maninder Pal Singh Brar v. Pb State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Fed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maninder Pal Singh Brar v. Pb State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Fed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeta Rani Vs State of Haryana and Others

Surinder Pal Vs State of Punjab and Others

Dalbir Singh Vs Shironmani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committiee

Baldev Singh Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Palwinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Ashok Malhotra and Prs. Vs the Pb. Coop Supply. and Ors.