This short order dismisses merits of a writ petition seeking retirement benefits and directs Respondent No.4 to decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 30.04.2024 by passing a speaking order within three months.
Direction to Respondent No.4 to decide legal notice dated 30.04.2024 by passing a speaking order within 03 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.20315 of 2024 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
122
CWP No.20315 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.08.2024
Sahib Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
MOHD YAKUB 2024.08.22 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CWP No.20315 of 2024 (O&M)
2
(Annexure P-12). He submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied, if the said legal notice is decided by passing a speaking order within a time bound frame.
(NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE
22.08.2024
yakub
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2024.08.22 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the legal notice dated 30.04.2024 filed by the petitioner should be decided by respondent No.4 by passing a speaking order.
Whether the petitioner's stay of further proceedings till the decision of the legal notice should be allowed.
Sahib Singh
State of Punjab and others
NAMIT KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
