Former contract employees sought dearness allowance arrears and interest after a 20.12.2022 enhancement was paid to others but not them. On respondents' counsel's assurance that their legal notice would be disposed of within three months, the writ petition was disposed of without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-18755-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
122 CWP-18755-2024
Date of Decision : 06.08.2024
SUSHILA AND ORS …. PETITIONERS
V/S
UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS
…. RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Pardeep Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashish Rawal, Advocate and Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocate For the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to the respondents to release dearness allowance arrears along with interest in view of order dated 20.12.2022 (Annexure P-1).
Anju Goel benefit has not been extended to them. They have served upon 2024.08.06 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-18755-2024 2
respondents representation/legal notice dated 16.02.2024 but to no avail.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
06.08.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.08.06 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents must release dearness allowance arrears with interest to former contract employees per order dated 20.12.2022.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushila and Ors
Union Territory of Chandigarh
Ors
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
