petitioner since Kharif 2002 as Pujari of the Dera. He has submitted that aggrieved by the said order, the respondent filed an appeal before the Collector, which was illegally accepted by him vide his order dated 19.10.2004. Aggrieved petitioner filed the second appeal before the Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, however, the same was rejected by learned Commissioner vide order dated 17.01.2007. The petitioner thereafter filed ROR-339-2006-2007 before learned Financial Commissioner, who accepted the same vide order dated 19.04.2010 and the order of the learned Commissioner was set aside. It is submitted that the case was remanded by the learned Financial Commissioner to the learned Collector with a direction to pass a decision afresh on merits. He has submitted that on remand, the learned Collector ignored the fact that Khasra Girdawari was to be prepared as per the possession and thus he illegally accepted the appeal of the respondent vide his order dated 23.12.2010. Petitioner challenged the order dated 23.12.2010 before the learned Commissioner, who dismissed the same vide impugned order dated 17.10.2012. Aggrieved the petitioner filed the revision petition before the learned Financial Commissioner against the order dated 23.12.2010, however, learned Financial Commissioner, without appreciating the evidence on record, dismissed the same by passing the non-speaking order dated 21.12.2023. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.1 while deciding the revision petition has gone beyond the pleadings as well as the evidence on record and, thus, has dismissed the same by observing that the dispute lies within the domain of the Civil Court and not the Revenue Court whereas, the issue involved
