Writ petition withdrawn at counsel's request with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18089-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.08.2024
Rajinder Pal Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: Mr. Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh one, on the same cause of action, with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
01.08.2024 yakub
(NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
MOHD YAKUB 2024.08.01 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
Rajinder Pal Singh
State of Punjab
Namit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
