A writ petition by Nirmal Singh against the Armed Forces Tribunal was disposed of by referring to orders passed the same date in a companion case, CWP No.6958 of 2012 (Anil Kumar Bishnoi vs. Union of India). No independent decision or reasoning is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17200 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.05.2015
Nirmal Singh
... Petitioner
VS.
Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh & Ors. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Siddhant Kant, Advocate for the petitioner
None for UOI
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
For orders, see CWP No.6958 of 2012 titled as
No.675477 Ex LAC Anil Kumar Bishnoi vs. Union of India &
Ors. of even date.
������������� ������
�����������
��������������
�����������������
������
V.VISHAL 2015.05.30 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
No.675477 Ex LAC Anil Kumar Bishnoi vs. Union of India & Ors.Referred
CWP No.6958 of 2012 titled as No.675477 Ex LAC Anil Kumar Bishnoi vs. Union of India & Ors.
Nirmal Singh
Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh
Surya Kant
P.B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
