Disposed

Mohd. Mustak and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Jan 2024CWP/1699/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the petition without merits, directing the Haryana Public Service Commission to decide pending representations dated 02.01.2024 within three months by passing a speaking order under penalty of costs of ₹25,000.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 to decide pending representations within three months by a speaking order under penalty of costs.

Mohd. Mustak and Others Vs State of… — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:010325

CWP-1699-2024

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

113

¶6

CWP-1699-2024 Date of Decision: 25.01.2024

¶7

Mohd. Mustak and others …Petitioner(s)

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶11

Present:Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners

¶12

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶13

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate with Mr. Govind Tanwar, Advocate for respondent no.3

¶14

¶15

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶16

This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned final result dated 19.12.2023, Annexure P-3. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the Commission to conduct the written test and interview again and send answer sheets to an independent expert for fresh evaluation.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to decide the pending representations, dated 02.01.2024, Annexure P-5 to P-7, in

¶18

a specified period.

¶19

PAYAL 2024.01.25 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:010325

CWP-1699-2024

-2-

Notice of motion.

¶24

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent no.3, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending representations shall be decided by respondent No.3 expeditiously.

¶25

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/Secretary, Haryana Public Service Commission, to consider and decide the pending representations dated 02.01.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶26

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioners.

¶27

		(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
25.01.2024
Payal
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
	Whether reportable	Yes/No

¶28

PAYAL 2024.01.25 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Mohd. Mustak and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Mustak and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagpal Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Subhash and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sakshi Khurana Vs Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Hisar and Ors.

Poonam Rani Vs State of Haryana and Others

Gaurav and Others Vs Executive Council, Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad,and Others

Sandeep Vs Pt. B.D Sharma University of Health Sciences and Others