Writ petition challenging an order of 2002; counsel pleaded no instructions and the court observed the impugned order may no longer survive due to efflux of time. The petition was disposed of with liberty to seek revival if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
387
CWP-16450-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.11.2024
Satish Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
be surviving.
| (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 08.11.2024 | ||
| Hemant | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes / No | |
| Whether reportable | : Yes / No |
HAMANT 2024.11.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satish Kumar
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
