Petitioner sought regularisation in service; State counsel submitted he had already been regularised as Sweeper-cum-Chowkidar and had joined, rendering the petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
208
CWP-16225-1999 Date of Decision: 22.07.2024
Jai Bhagwan
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:None for the petitioner
Mr. Rohit Arya, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed, inter alia , seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the petitioner in service from the date of his entitlement.
22.07.2024 Payal
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2024.07.22 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Jai Bhagwan
State of Haryana
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
