Petition challenging a BSF posting order to Malkangiri, Orissa. The court noted the petitioner had since been transferred to Jammu & Kashmir in July 2024, rendering the petition infructuous, and disposed of it with liberty to represent any surviving grievance to the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
222 CWP-1 6 202-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.12.2024
Shiv Om
..Petitioner
Versus
Union of Indi a and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: N one for the petitioner.
M r. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with M s. Gurmeet K. Gill, Sr. Panel C o unsel, Union of India. * ***** *
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 17.12.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.12.17 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shiv Om
Union of India
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
