Disposed

Ravi v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Jan 2024CWP/1607/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a selection process but sought only the evaluation criteria. State counsel stated any representation seeking such information would be considered and answered within four weeks. Petition was disposed of as not pressed, with liberty to pursue remedies if still aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty to file representation and avail appropriate remedies.

Ravi Vs State of Haryana and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral CitationNo.2024:PHHC:010150

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

107

¶4

CWP-1607-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 25.01.2024

RAVI

. . .PETITIONER

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶9

. . . RESPONDENTS

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶11

PRESENT: Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Harpriya Khaneka, Advocate for respondent-HPSC.

¶13

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.

¶14

¶15

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is challenging the selection process for the post in question undertaken by the respondents with respect to advertisement No. 22/2023 dated 16.03.2023 (Annexure P-1), but at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case, the information regarding as to how and under which criteria, the petitioner has been evaluated while conducting the selection process by the respondents, is given to him.

¶17

Notice of motion.

¶18

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that in case, the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the selection process undertaken by the respondents, he is free to file a representation with the authority concerned claiming the information regarding criteria under which the petitioner has been evaluated while conducting the selection process and in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same will be considered and an appropriate

¶19

RIYA 2024.01.29 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CWP-1607-2024 (O&M)

¶21

2024:PHHC:010150

¶22

-2-

¶23

information, which is admissible under the law will be given to the petitioner by the authority concerned within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further but liberty be given to the petitioner that in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved qua the selection process undertaken by the respondents, he can avail appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum in accordance with law.

¶25

Ordered accordingly.

¶26

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE

¶27

25.01.2024 Riya

¶28

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶29

RIYA 2024.01.29 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ravi v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anamika Gupta Vs State of Haryana and Others

Pankaj Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mohd. Yasar Luqman Vs State of Haryana and Others

Raman Kumar Vs Sumit Kumar and Ors.

Karar Hussain Vs State of Haryana and Others

Raj Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Another