Writ petition challenging a GST authority's order withdrawn with liberty to file appeal; court directed that limitation be examined in light of pleas available to the petitioner before the appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-16041-2024 (O&M)
-1-
127
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-16041-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2024
M/S ESS EMM KOMPOSIT WORKS PRIV A TE LIMITED Vs.
. . . . Petitione r
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DI V ISION WEST 2 GURUGRAM
. . . . Responden t
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: M r. Anuj Dewan, Advocate f or the petitioner.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
July 15, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.16 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S ESS EMM KOMPOSIT WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED
Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division West 2 Gurugram
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
