Single-judge oral order disposing of a writ petition seeking to set aside a confirmation setting aside order. Petitioners' counsel stated loss of contact; respondent counsel noted retirement of most petitioners. Court disposed the petition without reasoned decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-15707-2001 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
359 CWP-15707-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.05.2024
HC DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS … PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate and Mr.Nikhil Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
her client.
Anju Goel 2024.05.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2
CWP-15707-2001 (O&M)
cause survives.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 10.05.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
