The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition to challenge subsequent orders rejecting his claim. The State counsel submitted the representation had been decided. The Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to challenge the impugned orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 108
Civil Writ Petition No.15426 of 2024
Date of Decision: July 29, 2024
Vinod Kumar Sharma
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral)
Learned State counsel has submitted that pursuant to the order, dated 22.07.2024, the representation has been decided by the Director, Secondary Education, on 25.07.2024. A copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner, alongwith the office order No.019089 dated 24.07.2024, based upon which the claim has been rejected.
petition with liberty to challenge the orders, dated 24.07.2024 and 25.07.2024.
(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge July 29, 2024
avin
Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2024.07.30 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
Vinod Kumar Sharma
State of Haryana
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
