Allowed

Siddhi International Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Oct 2024CWP/15092/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside the orders rejecting the petitioner's application for financial assistance for technology acquisition. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation for review/reconsideration, which the authorities must decide expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Orders rejecting application set aside; petitioner directed to seek review/reconsideration of appeal.

Siddhi International Metalloys Pvt… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

239 CWP-15092-2024 Date of Decision: 25.10.2024

¶3

SIDDHI INTERNATIONAL METALLOYS PVT. LTD.

¶4

... Petitioner

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶7

... Respondents

¶8

**CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. ******

¶9

Present: Mr. Harsh Mehla, Advocate for Mr. Satyam Aneja, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. ****

¶11

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

¶12

Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 01.03.2024 passed by respondent No.2-Appellate Authority-cum-Addl. Chief Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Government of Haryana as well as to the order dated 20.06.2023 passed by respondent No.3-Director, MSME whereby the application of the petitioner company has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to accept the application of the petitioner under the scheme of financial assistance for technology acquisition, as applied by the petitioner-Company on 04.07.2022 in view of the notification dated 08.06.2021.

¶13

Learned State Counsel has handed over today in Court a copy of Memo No.MSME/TAS/CWP-15092/2024/4269 dated 30.09.2024, wherein it has been averred that the Administrative Secretary had earlier decided to keep the appeals on hold for clarifying the conditions mentioned in the corrigendum dated 29.11.2023

¶14

RAJENDER KUMAR 2024.10.28 08:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

-2-

¶16

CWP-15092-2024

¶17

and that after filing of the present writ petition, the issue of the petitioner was also highlighted before the Administrative Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Haryana. Upon considering the same, Administrative Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Haryana has decided to review/reconsider all the appeals/applications under the present scheme, which are already decided or yet to be decided by the Administrative Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Haryana.

¶18

It has thus been conveyed that the petitioner may be directed to submit his representation before the Administrative Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Haryana for reviewing/reconsidering his appeal, which shall then be decided in accordance with law by passing a speaking order.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid communication, the present writ petition is allowed. The order dated 01.03.2024 passed by respondent No.2-Appellate Authority-cum-Addl. Chief Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Government of Haryana as well as the order dated 20.06.2023 passed by respondent No.3-Director, MSME are hereby set aside.

¶20

The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application/ representation for seeking review/reconsideration of his appeal No.109 of 2023. On submission of such an application by the petitioner for seeking review/ reconsideration of his abovementioned appeal, an appropriate order shall be passed in the said appeal on merits and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties expeditiously.

¶21

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) OCTOBER 25, 2024. JUDGE rajender

¶22

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶23

RAJENDER KUMAR 2024.10.28 08:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Siddhi International Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddhi International Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Account Officer III Chandigarh Housing Board and Another Vs Kala Kaur and Another

Rakesh Jain and Others Vs Principal Secretary and Others

Raj Kumar Vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Nirmala Rani Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

M/S Nikky Transport Company Vs Axis Bank Ltd.

Bunty Baluja Vs Harpreet Kaur and Anr.