Writ petition withdrawn at the outset as counsel sought liberty to refile with better particulars and necessary documents, citing incurable defects in the petition.
Liberty to withdraw the petition and file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 14767 of 2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2024
Atimukt Jain …. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
….. Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Kanishk Swaroop, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G. Haryana with Mr. Karan Jindal, Asstt. A.G. Haryana and Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for MC Sonepat.
ARUN PALLI, J (Oral)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits, for the petition suffers from certain incurable defects, and also certain documents that are germane to the matter in issue are required to be appended, he be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE
10.07.2024
deepak
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR 2024.07.11 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh
Atimukt Jain
State of Haryana
Arun Palli
Vikram Aggarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
