Writ petition seeking step up of pay in terms of a departmental order passed pursuant to earlier court directions. State counsel stated the petitioners' case would be considered in light of the departmental order; petition disposed of on that statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-13152-20 2 4
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
134 CWP-13152-2024 Date of Decision : 29.05.2024
SARWAN SIN G H AND ORS … PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PU N JAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : M r .Nitesh Singla, Advocate fo r the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.05.29 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-13152-20 2 4 2
considered in th e light of order dated 17.09.202 0 (Annexure P-10) passed by the department.
petition stands d isposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
29.05.2024 anju W hether speaking/reasoned Yes/No W hether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.29 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukhwinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and OthersReferred
CWP No.8290 of 2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarwan Singh and others
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
