The present petition was adjourned sine die earlier and ordered to be listed. A subsequent appearance by the petitioner without plausible explanation was treated as non-prosecution.
petition dismissed for non-prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-1247-2022
-1-
Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:047965
112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-1247-2022 Date of Decision: April 09, 2024
Jaswinder Singh
......Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.Sushant Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(through VC).
Ms.Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana.
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition is for quashing of order dated 14.01.2022, passed by respondent No.3, Annexure P-14, dismissing appeal of the petitioner under Section 408 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 against the order dated 16.12.2021 and the Show Cause Notice, dated 06.05.2019, passed by respondent No.2 vide which the petitioner was put to notice to vacate the demised premises situated in Khasra No.31, village Majri, Hadbast No.385, Tehsil and District Panchkula, wherein it has been running a furniture shop for more than 35 years, without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the present case and being violative of law, being arbitrary, illegal, and perverse.
However, the present case was adjourned sine die, to be listed after decision of CWP-15980-2022. On 29.01.2024, petitioner filed an application for listing the case as CWP-15980-2022 was decided. The case MEENU 2024.04.10 12:14 was ordered to be listed today, i.e. 09.04.2024. Today request for I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-1247-2022 -2-
Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:047965
adjournment has been made without any plausible explanation. It seems the
neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing this case.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
| April 09, 2024 meenuss |
( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| 1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? |
Yes/No |
| 2. Whether reportable ? |
Yes/No |
MEENU 2024.04.10 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jaswinder Singh
The State of Haryana
Others
Rajesh Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
