Petition withdrawn as rendered infructuous; writ petition dismissed as infructuous with pending applications disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
104
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12183-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2024
M/S SHIV A NI WOOLLEN MILLS, PANI P AT
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Vs.
. . . . Petitio n er . . . . Respondents
****
**CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH ******
Present Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
August 12, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whe t her speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whe t her reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.08.13 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Shivani Woollen Mills, Panipat
Union of India and Others
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
