Petitioner sought directions to respondents to consider her representation regarding cancellation of passport obtained by respondent No. 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11845 of 2024 Date of Decision:20.05.2024
Sarika Uppal
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Amrita Singh, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.20 05:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 11845 of 2024 -2-
disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
20.05.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.20 05:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarika Uppal
Union of India
Mohan Dev Sharma
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
