No appearance for the petitioner despite the matter being called twice; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to apply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11691-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.08.2024
M/s Amico T e xtiles
…Petitioner
Versus
Reserve Bank of India and another
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : N one for the petitioner. ***
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
M atter has been called twice. N o one has put in appearance on b ehalf of the petitioner. This petition is dismissed for wa n t of prosecution. Liberty to apply.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
(LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE
August 07, 2024 vandana Whether spea k ing/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repo r table : Yes/No
VANDANA 2024.08.07 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Page 1 of 1
M/s Amico Textiles
Reserve Bank of India
Anupinder Singh Grewal
Lapita Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
