The petitioner filed a writ petition but expired before hearing. An earlier order granted the petitioner's counsel a last opportunity to place legal representatives on record. No application or appearance was made, leading to dismissal in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.126
CWP-10116-2023
Date of decision : 18.11.2024
Mohan Lal .…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr.Vivek Chauhan, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J . (Oral)
“As per the earlier orders passed, petitioner has expired. No step has been taken by counsel for the petitioner to bring on record his legal representatives. In our considered opinion, it is the duty of counsel for the petitioner to take appropriate steps and if the LRs of the deceased-petitioner are not interested, appropriate orders have to be passed.
Accordingly, last opportunity is granted for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased-petitioner, on or before next date of hearing, i.e., 18.11.2024.”
bring on record the legal representative(s) of the deceased petitioner.
[DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE
[DEEPAK GUPTA]
18.11.2024 [DEEPAK GUPTA] shamsher JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
SHAMSHER SINGH 2024.11.19 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
Mohan Lal
State of Haryana
Deepak Sibal
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
