Allowed

Deepak v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Sept 2024CRWP/9394/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Article 226 for release of alleged detenues. Court directed the concerned SDM to visit the place of detention, verify custody, and order immediate release if found illegal. Petition allowed with specific directions; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to concerned SDM to verify custody and ensure immediate release of alleged detenues if found to be in illegal custody.

Deepak Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRWP-9394-2024

¶2

123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRWP-9394-2024

¶4

Date of Decision: 25.09.2024

Deepak

...Pe��oner

Versus

State of Punjab and others …Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶10

Present: Mr. Sham Lal Saha, Advocate for the pe��oner.

¶11

Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

¶12

¶13

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶14

Seeking release of the alleged detenues, the pe��oner has come up before this Court under Ar�cle 226 of the Cons�tu�on of India.

¶15

No�ces served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of no�ces to the private respondents is required.

¶16

The allega�ons regarding illegal deten�on are stated in paragraph no. 4 of the pe��on and prima facie, point towards some restrain. Given above, considering the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, it shall be appropriate that the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate, either on its own or through a warrant officer or any other officer authorized by the DM/SDM, visit the place of deten�on and, if the persons are found to be in illegal custody, ensure their immediate release, subject to verifica�on, that there are no malafide inten�ons and the custody is bonafide, apart from other aspects which would require considera�on. If such an officer needs police assistance, the SHO of the concerned police sta�on(s) shall provide it.

¶17

This pe��on is closed with the direc�ons men�oned above, which are to be complied with on a priority. It is clarified that there is no adjudica�on on merits and that this order is not a blanket bail in any FIR. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interroga�on of the alleged detenues is required in any

¶18

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.26 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶19

¶20

CRWP-9394-2024

¶21

cognizable case. It shall also be open for the pe��oner to approach this Court again for

¶22

any surviving or consequent grievances.

¶23

5. There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Pe��oner and State can download this order and other relevant par�culars from the official web page of this court and a�est it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authen�city and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

¶24

Pe��on is allowed to the extent men�oned above . All pending applica�ons, if any, stand disposed.

¶25

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶26

25.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma

¶27

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No .

¶28

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.26 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶29

Deepak v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaldeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Raj Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Sushil Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Meenakshi and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Pardeep Kumar and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Pooja Kumari and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others