Disposed

Guppreet Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Oct 2024CRWP/7791/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held no further direction was necessary in light of the State counsel's submission regarding the father's statement assuring no threats and freedom for the petitioners. The petition was disposed of with an instruction for the Senior Superintendent of Police to act expeditiously per the prior order dated 13.08.2024.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police to act expeditiously in terms of the order dated 13.08.2024.

Guppreet Kaur and Another Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

CRWP-7791-2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRWP-7791-2024 Date of Decision: 04.10.2024

¶5

Gurpreet Kaur & another ...Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of P unjab & others ...Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶9

Present: Mr. Simranjit Singh and Mr. Parminder Singh Nijjar, Advoc a tes, for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhali w al, AAG, Punjab.

¶11

None for respondents No.4 t o 10.

¶12

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)

¶13

Today, learned State cou n sel submitted that during th e course of inquiry, statement of responde n t No.4 – Sukhdev Singh, who i s father of p etitioner No.1 – Gurpreet Kaur was recorded, wherein he state d that he n e ver threatened the petitioners a n d that the petitioners are free t o live any w here as per their wish and tha t he will not interfere into thei r lives.

¶14

On 13.08.2024, Mr. Ragha v Goyal, Advocate, had put i n appearan c e on behalf of respondents No.4 to 10 and had file d Memora n dum of Appearance and had ta k en a stand that petitioner No.1 was of ‘ u nsound mind’. However, nothi n g to this effect has been state d

¶15

VIMAL KUMAR 2024.10.04 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

¶17

CRWP-7791-2024

¶18

by the fat h er of petitioner No.1 i.e. respo n dent No.4, whose statement ha s been recorded by the police.

¶19

In view of the abovestated p osition, no further direction i s required t o be issued. The instant peti t ion is accordingly disposed o f with a direction to respondent No.2 – the Senior Superintendent o f Police, S r i Mukhtsar Sahib to do the n e edful expeditiously in terms o f order dat e d 13.08.2024.

¶20

A copy of this be sent to respondent No.2 - the Senio r Superintendent of Police, Sri Mukhtsar S a hib.

¶21

04.10.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Vimal JUDGE

¶22

Whether speaking/reason e d: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶23

VIMAL KUMAR 2024.10.04 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Guppreet Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guppreet Kaur and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Davinder Kumar Vs Rajat Kakkar and Another

Aman Vs State of Haryana

Akashdeep Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

Sikander @ Rinku Vs State of Punjab

Sukhwinder Singh Alias Ladi Vs State of Punjab

Bunty Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Ors.