Petition seeking directions to protect life and liberty from private respondents. State's reply recorded that petitioner stated he faced no threat. Petitioner absent on two dates; the petition was disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to approach again if any apprehension arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRWP-379-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.12.2024
Salim Khan … Petitioner
Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:None for the petitioner.
Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, APP, U.T. Chandigarh.
Mr. Gurdial Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5.
None for respondent No.7.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2024.12.12 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP-379-2024 (O&M)
( 2 )
11.12.2024 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL ) mohan JUDGE
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
MOHAN SINGH 2024.12.12 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct official respondents to protect the petitioner's life and liberty from private respondents?
Salim Khan
State of U.T. Chandigarh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
