Disposed

Shalu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Mar 2024CRWP/2730/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Married couple sought police protection of life and liberty against private respondents who opposed their marriage. Court directed SSP Ferozepur to decide their pending representation and grant protection if threat perceived, without expressing opinion on marriage validity.

What did the court decide?

Direction to SSP, Ferozepur to decide petitioners' representation and grant protection if threat to life/liberty is perceived.

Shalu and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

105

¶2

��

¶3

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRWP No.2730 of 2024 Date of Decision: 27.03.2024

¶5

Shalu and another

¶6

..... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

**CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *****

¶11

Present: None for the petitioners. *******

¶12

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to provide adequate protection for life and liberty of the petitioners, who are in imminent danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7. Further prayer has been made for directing respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners.

¶14

Perusal of the record shows that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 7 and have sought protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger from respondents No.4 to 7. Their marriage certificate and photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P-4 and P-5. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 19.03.2024 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2.

¶15

Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3-State only.

¶16

RITTU 2024.03.27 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CRWP No.2730 of 2024

¶18

2024:PHHC:042395

¶19

-2-

¶20

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State.

¶21

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, Punjab to decide the representation (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners.

¶22

Disposed of.

¶23

		(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE
27.03.2024
rittu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
	Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶24

RITTU 2024.03.27 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Shalu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shalu and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inder Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Dinesh Thakran Vs State of Haryana

Paramjeet and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rekha Devi Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Amandeep Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Pradeep Kumar and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others