Habeas corpus petition concerning detenue Palak; the detenue made a statement in court in a connected petition, so no further order was needed and the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
249/1
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-2193-2024 Decided on: 17.07.2024
Ombeer Singh
.... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana & another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present: Mr. Pankaj Chandgothia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Naveen Upadhyay, Advocate for the respondent.
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral)
In view of the statement made by the detenue Palak in Court today in CRWP No.2242 of 2024, no further order is called for in the present case.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as having
been rendered infructuous.
17.07.2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) sonia JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
SONIA BURA 2024.07.17 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ombeer Singh
State of Haryana
Palak
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
