Petition seeking protection of life and liberty in what the State described as a property/land dispute. State counsel stated on affidavit there was no threat perception and undertook to act if any arose. The High Court found no ground for directions and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
242
CRWP-117-2024 Date of decision: 24.07.2024
PAWAN KUMAR AND ANOTHER
....Petitioners
V/s
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present:Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Advocate for, Mr. Vipan Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
POONAM RATHORE 2024.07.25 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRWP-117-2024
-2-
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE
July 24, 2024 poonam
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
POONAM RATHORE 2024.07.25 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to official respondents for protection of the petitioners' life and liberty despite the State's averment of no threat perception.
Pawan Kumar
Another petitioner (unnamed in text)
State of Punjab
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
