Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared on none of three consecutive hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR(F)-828-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2024
VIJAY KUMAR
......PETITIONER
Vs.
AYODYA DEVI @ JYOTI
.........RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present:- None for the petitioner.
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN J. (ORAL)
Even on the 2nd call, no one has put an appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The same was the situation on the last two dates of hearing, i.e. 10.09.2024 and 06.09.2024. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
September 23, 2024 (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether reportable No
Nitin 2024.09.27 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
VIJAY KUMAR
AYODYA DEVI @ JYOTI
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
